RW.3 LEVEL 6 EVALUATE USE OF TECHNIQUES LEVEL 5 I can evaluate the AND TECHNOLOGY LEVEL 4 I can evaluate the maker’s use of LEVEL 3 maker’s use of techniques and LEVEL 2 I can highlight techniques and tools, and how well I can identify specific examples of the tools, and how well they served the LEVEL 1 ways the maker maker’s use of they served the maker’s purpose I can look for specific used media features techniques and maker’s purpose. and/or achieved With guidance, I ways the maker did (e.g., words, phrases, tools and discuss beauty, power, or can notice when an something to attract images, music) to their purpose, I can analyze how persuasiveness. author/creator did my attention, and attract my attention e昀昀ectiveness, and all the elements of something to attract talk about the e昀昀ect and I can generate how they contribute a work (e.g., subject, I can analyze how my attention and it had on me. ideas about why to the overall e昀昀ect form, and technique) all the elements of a describe it in my own these techniques of the work. and its context work and its context words. I can share ideas were used. combine to create combine to create about why the I can use criteria to e昀昀ect. e昀昀ect, as well as how I can say what I liked author/creator I can use a set of evaluate and, when di昀昀erent audiences about the work and might have made given criteria to applicable, compare I can develop and might experience why. choices about what evaluate a work. multiple works. use criteria to the work di昀昀erently. to make stand out. evaluate and compare works. I can develop and use criteria to evaluate and compare works, considering such factors as production value, accessibility, or originality. 40
Future9 Framework Page 39 Page 41