Researcher & e gathered perspectives towards reDesign’s Future9 Competencies from nearly two dozen reviewers who have experience in the field as teachers, Educator Weducation leaders, policymakers, researchers, and content experts. They each Perspectives provided input on the competencies as a collective set, and then took a deep dive into the particular competencies and progressions that aligned with their expertise and background. Here’s some key learnings that informed revisions to the competencies. HOLISTIC APPROACH 4.71 out of 5
Across survey questions QUALITY OF DESIGN about the face validity of the WORTHWHILE SKILLS framework, the average rating LIFE-LONG RELEVANCY was 4.71 out of 5 on a scale from 1-5 that measured level of CLEAR SCAFFOLDING agreement. & PROGRESSION FOR LEARNERS Wanted to see more: Within the bias review: Further recommendations Connections to formative assessment General agreement that there were that informed our revisions tools, support for teachers to map no significant issues of bias, with the included evidence of learning to a particular potential for the competencies to be used incorporating more “community- level, understanding of how to use this as an “inclusive tool for discussion” embedded” approaches in the design as a tool for growth and reflection that was fairly universal in design and solutions portion, and throughout, for students versus for ranking, co- managed to “tackle sensitive issues considering how to support creation and co-design, guidance for creatively”, “look at ways that students neurodivergent learners, early how to coordinate use across di昀昀erent go beyond themselves”, and place value childhood development, and variation classrooms and subjects on the experiences of people from in implementation contexts. various backgrounds. 10